On 9/13/19 8:45 AM, Irvin Probst wrote:
On 13/09/2019 14:05, Philip Hodge wrote:
Isn't that just for consistency with Python 3 round()? I agree that
the discrepancy with np.set_printoptions is not necessarily expected,
except possibly for backwards compatibility.
I've just c
On 9/13/19 7:23 AM, Andras Deak wrote:
I just want to add that you can use literal 16.055 to reproduce this:
import numpy as np
np.set_printoptions(precision=2)
np.array([16.055]).round(2)
array([16.06])
np.array([16.055])
array([16.05])
I would think it has to do with "round to nearest eve
