] https://github.com/gazprom-neft/petroflow
> [2] https://github.com/climate-strike/analysis
> [3] https://github.com/climate-strike/license
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
d have separate arrays of coordinates describing the spatial extent of
the data along the relevant dimensions--each of these arrays of coordinates
would have their own physical quantity information.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
__
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
s not-welcome,
rather than completely ignoring the fact that 99% of "political beliefs"
are perfectly welcome within the community?
The CoC is about spelling out the community norms--how about just spelling
out that we welcome everyone, but, in the words of Will Wheaton, "Don't
one big one that combines them all). That way, people who want the
finer-grained checking (say for a more limited array-like) can use a
common, shared, existing ABC, rather than having everyone re-invent it.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing lis
7;ve been given
need converting?"
There are also a lot of places where matplotlib needs to know if we have
actually been given a MaskedArray so that we can handle it specially.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
how in the world do you detect that with an ABC???
>
Even documenting expected behavior as part of these ABCs would go a long
way towards helping standardize behavior.
Another idea would be to put together a conformance test suite as part of
this effort, in lieu of some kind of run-time checking of behavior (which
would be terrible). That would help developers of other "ducks" check that
they're doing the right things. I'd imagine the existing NumPy test suite
would largely cover this.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
is not a bad thing to actually give
code some thought.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Cannot convert from 'meter' ([length])
> to 'dimensionless' (dimensionless)
>
Well, the Taylor series for exp (around a=0) is:
exp(x) = 1 + x + x**2 / 2 + x**3 / 6 + ...
so for that to properly add up, x needs to be dimensionless. It should be
noted, though, that I
ork with using the existing units.
>
I'm sure you wrote that thinking units didn't play a role, but the math
behind those operations works perfectly fine with units, with things
cancelling out properly to give the same units out as in.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
50 whether passing a subclass to a function
will actually behave as expected--even if there's no good reason it
shouldn't.
Ryan
--
Ryan May
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
11 matches
Mail list logo
