Hi Sebastian, all,
I’d lean towards an error too, given that the invariants implied by the Python
implementation clearly aren‘t met. No strong opinions though.
Best regards,
Hameer Abbasi
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 30.11.2022 um 18:36 schrieb Sebastian Berg :
>
> Hi all,
>
> there is a
> I’m On 25. Aug 2018, at 00:13, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:36 AM Hameer Abbasi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 9:38 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:02 AM, wro
Hi everyone,
> On 23. Aug 2018, at 17:35, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:57 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> I mean, the idea of the envvar is to be a temporary measure enable
>> devs to experiment with a provisional feature, while being awkward
>> enough that people don't buil
I’m +0 on removing it, so mostly neutral, but slightly in favour. While I see
the argument for having it, I also see it as a violation of DRY... The
information is already available in relevant arguments.
I doubt any people implementing this protocol are going to be lazy enough not
to implement
> On 11. Aug 2018, at 00:24, Foad Sojoodi Farimani
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> My first email here, so sorry in advance if I'm violating any rules.
> I'm trying to implement the convolution of NumPy arrays of arbitrary
> dimension in order to get Cauchy product of multivariate power serie
