Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 32: Remove the financial functions from NumPy

2019-09-11 Thread Warren Weckesser
On 9/3/19, Warren Weckesser wrote: > Github issue 2880 ("Get financial functions out of main namespace", > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/2880) has been open since 2013. In a > recent community meeting, it was suggested that we create a NEP to propose > the removal of the financial

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 32: Remove the financial functions from NumPy

2019-09-11 Thread Warren Weckesser
On 9/9/19, D.S. McNeil wrote: > [coming over from the pydata post] > > I just checked about ~150KLOC of our Python code in a financial context, > written by about twenty developers over about four years. Almost every > function uses numpy, sometimes directly and sometimes via pandas. > > It

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 32: Remove the financial functions from NumPy

2019-09-09 Thread D.S. McNeil
[coming over from the pydata post] I just checked about ~150KLOC of our Python code in a financial context, written by about twenty developers over about four years. Almost every function uses numpy, sometimes directly and sometimes via pandas. It seems like these functions were never used

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 32: Remove the financial functions from NumPy

2019-09-08 Thread Warren Weckesser
On 9/4/19, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe worth asking over at the Pandas list? I bet there are more > Python / finance people over there. OK, I sent a message to the PyData mailing list. Warren > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 7:11 PM Ilhan Polat wrote: >> >> +1 on

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 32: Remove the financial functions from NumPy

2019-09-04 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, Maybe worth asking over at the Pandas list? I bet there are more Python / finance people over there. Cheers, Matthew On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 7:11 PM Ilhan Polat wrote: > > +1 on removing them from NumPy. I think there are plenty of alternatives > already so many that we might even

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 32: Remove the financial functions from NumPy

2019-09-04 Thread Ilhan Polat
+1 on removing them from NumPy. I think there are plenty of alternatives already so many that we might even consider deprecating them just like SciPy misc module by pointing to alternatives. On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:38 PM Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 08:56 -0400, Warren

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 32: Remove the financial functions from NumPy

2019-09-04 Thread Martin.Gfeller
Dear all As a user of Numpy in finance, I'm absolutely in favour of removing these functions. They're too domain-specific, not flexible and general enough for widespread use, and probably not easy to maintain. Best regards Martin ___

[Numpy-discussion] NEP 32: Remove the financial functions from NumPy

2019-09-03 Thread Warren Weckesser
Github issue 2880 ("Get financial functions out of main namespace", https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/2880) has been open since 2013. In a recent community meeting, it was suggested that we create a NEP to propose the removal of the financial functions from NumPy. I have submitted "NEP 32: