[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, at 10:13, Matthew Brett wrote: > If you haven't got to it, I can do it. Filed a PR for this last night: https://github.com/multi-build/docker-images/pull/20 Best regards, Stéfan ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussio

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

Hi Stefan, If you haven't got to it, I can do it. Cheers, Matthew On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 1:13 AM Stefan van der Walt wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021, at 07:56, Matthew Brett wrote: > > My guess is that that would be less than 90 minutes of work for > > someone with some Docker experience. > >

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:18 PM Andrew Nelson wrote: > >> >> >> > I'd say we may perhaps want to do this, but only if and when it becomes >> much easier - for example once we have migrated all our wheel build infra >> to GitHub Actions an

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021, at 07:56, Matthew Brett wrote: > My guess is that that would be less than 90 minutes of work for > someone with some Docker experience. I'll give it a shot. Stéfan ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

Hi, On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:05 PM Matti Picus wrote: > > On 11/10/21 4:38 pm, Matthew Brett wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It will probably soon be trivial to do a manylinux Alpine build / test > > on multibuild. There's a work on progress PR here, > > > > https://github.com/matthew-brett/multibuild/p

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

On 11/10/21 4:38 pm, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, It will probably soon be trivial to do a manylinux Alpine build / test on multibuild. There's a work on progress PR here, https://github.com/matthew-brett/multibuild/pull/430 that only requires someone to build a trivial test container, in order t

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

Hi, It will probably soon be trivial to do a manylinux Alpine build / test on multibuild. There's a work on progress PR here, https://github.com/matthew-brett/multibuild/pull/430 that only requires someone to build a trivial test container, in order to get merged. It's also generally very easy

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:10 PM Matti Picus wrote: > > On 11/10/21 2:22 pm, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:52 AM Laurie O > > wrote: > > > > CI request: build PEP 656 > > (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0656/ > >

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:18 PM Andrew Nelson wrote: > > > > I'd say we may perhaps want to do this, but only if and when it becomes > much easier - for example once we have migrated all our wheel build infra > to GitHub Actions and cibuildwheel > > > I've been really impressed with cibuildwheel.

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

> I'd say we may perhaps want to do this, but only if and when it becomes much easier - for example once we have migrated all our wheel build infra to GitHub Actions and cibuildwheel I've been really impressed with cibuildwheel. It works well on my project, so I'd be interested to see how it goes

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

On 11/10/21 2:22 pm, Ralf Gommers wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:52 AM Laurie O > wrote: CI request: build PEP 656 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0656/ ) compliant "musllinux" wheels. This

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Musllinux wheels

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:52 AM Laurie O wrote: > CI request: build PEP 656 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0656/) > compliant "musllinux" wheels. This will allow easy installation in Alpine > Docker images. GitHub issue: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/20089 Thanks for asking Laurie