[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:35 AM Niyas Sait wrote: > Hi Niyas, I'd be interested in remote access to a development machine. >> This will help with NumPy and SciPy; and it would allow testing binaries >> resulting from a cross-compilation step. >> I don't have a preference for a Volterra box or an

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

> > Hi Niyas, I'd be interested in remote access to a development machine. > This will help with NumPy and SciPy; and it would allow testing binaries > resulting from a cross-compilation step. > I don't have a preference for a Volterra box or an Azure VM - as long as > it can be used for developmen

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 5:08 PM Niyas Sait wrote: > > When you say "we could request access to new Volterra machines": how do > > you see that playing out? Who would provide them, and who would maintain > > them? Would they be available to the more general scientific python > > community? Who woul

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

> When you say "we could request access to new Volterra machines": how do > you see that playing out? Who would provide them, and who would maintain > them? Would they be available to the more general scientific python > community? Who would pay the bill? Microsoft, Qualcomm, and Arm are very inte

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

When you say "we could request access to new Volterra machines": how do you see that playing out? Who would provide them, and who would maintain them? Would they be available to the more general scientific python community? Who would pay the bill? If the people supporting this niche platform st

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

Hello, It has been a while since we discussed adding CI/CD support for Windows on Arm. Let me share a few updates and see if we can find a way forward. First of all, Thanks for suggesting cibuildwheel. We have couple of patches in progress to add native [1] and cross-compilation support [2] to ci

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:15 PM Peter Cock wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:07 PM Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > Our current wheel build machinery is at > https://github.com/MacPython/numpy-wheels/, > > but please ignore that. We just merged a PR which uses cibuildwheel into > the main repo.

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:07 PM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > Our current wheel build machinery is at > https://github.com/MacPython/numpy-wheels/, > but please ignore that. We just merged a PR which uses cibuildwheel into the > main repo. > That should be the target. If cibuildwheel has/gains the ab

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy binary wheels and CI for win/arm64 platform

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:54 PM Niyas Sait wrote: > Hello, > > Numpy v1.21.2 added > support for windows/arm64 platforms but we still don't have any systems in > place to produce binary wheels or test win/arm64 packages. I think it will > be go