Oh sure, I'm not suggesting it be impossible to calculate for a single data
set. If nothing else, if we had a version that accepted a list of data
sets, then you could always pass in a single-element list :-).
On Mar 15, 2018 22:10, "Eric Wieser" wrote:
> That sounds like a reasonable extension
I will not be joining you for this sprint, but will be in the Bay Area from
May 12th to May 25th, and wouldn't mind spending a day visiting you.
If it works for you and anyone else want to join we could try to give it a
little more structure than "just came over to say hi!"
Jaime
On Thu, Mar 15
passing a list of arrays would be useful (aside of discriminating
between list and array_like)
In that case I would add a keyword like "within=True" to compute the additional
statistics like std or iqr on the group demeaned data.
This would remove the effect of (mean-)shifted datasets on those
aux
Hello, everyone. I’ve submitted a PR to add a initializer kwarg to
ufunc.reduce. This is useful in a few cases, e.g., it allows one to supply
a “default” value for identity-less ufunc reductions, and specify an
initial value for reductions such as sum (other than zero.)
Please feel free to review
