Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

2018-09-13 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:30 PM Stanley Seibert wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM Stanley Seibert >> wrote: >> >>> If you go beyond the free tier, you can connect self-managed build >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

2018-09-13 Thread Stanley Seibert
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the security model here. The onboarding wizard makes it pretty easy to get started, but the UI afterwards has a lot of complexity for managing fine grained permissions. As I understand it, I made a "numba" project with my Microsoft account, but I can add oth

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

2018-09-13 Thread Stanley Seibert
Another minor annoyance is that the link on the Github "Checks" page that says "View More Details on Azure Pipelines" takes you to a login page, which then forwards you to the public (no login required) pipeline build results page. As a result, people might not realize you can view the build resul

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

2018-09-13 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:30 AM Stanley Seibert wrote: > Another minor annoyance is that the link on the Github "Checks" page that > says "View More Details on Azure Pipelines" takes you to a login page, > which then forwards you to the public (no login required) pipeline build > results page. A

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

2018-09-13 Thread Stephan Hoyer
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 7:12 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:27 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote: > >> I propose to accept NEP-18, "A dispatch mechanism for NumPy’s high level >> array functions": >> http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html >> >> Since the last

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

2018-09-13 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Thanks for adding the clarifications. They read well to me, and I think make clear to a project like astropy what to expect (and I expect we'll be use it!). -- Marten ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/m

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

2018-09-13 Thread Hameer Abbasi
> On Thursday, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Stephan Hoyer (mailto:sho...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 7:12 PM Charles R Harris (mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:27 PM Stephan Hoyer > (mailto:sho...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > > > >

[Numpy-discussion] PR to add "weights" option to np.quantile

2018-09-13 Thread Chun-Wei Yuan
Hi all, I have a long-standing PR to add a "weights" option to np.quantile/percentile: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/9211 For a little background, there are quite a few ways to define "quantile" to begin with. Numpy defines it the same way as R's default (Type 7): https://www.rdocumentat