On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> I have now drafted these revisions to the NEP to clarify its stance around
> backwards compatibility, and the type of the "types" argument:
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11943
Okay, so this is a pretty substantial change! Before, th
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:33 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> > I have now drafted these revisions to the NEP to clarify its stance
> around
> > backwards compatibility, and the type of the "types" argument:
> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/p
I propose to accept NEP-22, "Duck typing for NumPy arrays – high level
overview":
http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0022-ndarray-duck-typing-overview.html
This NEP didn't generate much (any?) discussion on the mailing list when
Nathaniel and I sent it out a few months ago. But I still think the
high-l
I read the NEP again and think it is a good and useful one (also in
discussing why NEP 16 was not a good idea!). -- Marten
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
