> On Saturday, Oct 27, 2018 at 12:10 AM, Stefan van der Walt
> mailto:stef...@berkeley.edu)> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:27:49 +1300, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > Just to make sure we're talking about the same things here: Stefan, I think
> > with "sparray" you mean "an n-D sparse array implementa
> On Saturday, Oct 27, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Ralf Gommers (mailto:ralf.gomm...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 11:10 AM Stefan van der Walt (mailto:stef...@berkeley.edu)> wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:27:49 +1300, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > > Just to make sure we're talking about t
I would also argue against deprecating these functions that we are using
increasingly in several projects that I am involved in.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018, 01:28 Travis Oliphant wrote:
> What is the justification for deprecation exactly? These functions have
> been well documented and have had the i
I agree with Number 2 and 4.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 12:38 AM Eric Wieser
wrote:
> in order to be used prior to calling C or Fortran code that expected at
> least a 1-d array
>
> I’d argue that the behavior for these functions should have just been to
> raise an error saying “this function does
