I am slowly and not quickly stumbling forward, but at this point my
degree of mental entropy (confusion) is monumental.
This works:
import numpy as np
print('${d}')
data = np.genfromtxt("14-7.log", usecols=(1), skip_header=27,
skip_footer=1, encoding=None)
print(data)
np.savetxt('14-7.dG
You're trying to read a file with a name of literally `${d}.log`, which is
unlikely to be the name of your file. `${}` is bash syntax, not python
syntax.
This has drifted out of numpy territory and into "how to coordinate between
bash and python" territory - I'd perhaps recommend you ask this to a
According to NEP 29, numpy 1.18 will be released after Sept 2019,
which as I understand it is the cutoff for Python 3.5. In PR 14673
I proposed removing it from the test matrix and also removing some
shims in the code to support it - meaning that in order to use
N
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:31 AM Matti Picus wrote:
> According to NEP 29, numpy 1.18 will be released after Sept 2019, which as
> I understand it is the cutoff for Python 3.5. In PR 14673 I proposed
> removing it from the test matrix and also removing some shims in the code
> to support it - mean
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problem with np.savetxt
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:10:58 -0400
From: Stephen P. Molnar
To: numpy-discussion@python.org
I am slowly and not quickly stumbling forward, but at this point my
degree of mental entro
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, at 09:34, Charles R Harris wrote:
> I think we can support 3.5 as long as we please, the question is how long we
> *want* to support it. I don't plan to release 1.18 wheels for 3.5, but I'm
> concerned about making 1.18 outright incompatible with 3.5. I would like to
> see
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:02 PM Stefan van der Walt
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, at 09:34, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> I think we can support 3.5 as long as we please, the question is how long
> we *want* to support it. I don't plan to release 1.18 wheels for 3.5, but
> I'm concerned about maki
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:44 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-10-09 at 21:26 -0700, Zijie Poh wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
> >
> > It is Tuesday October 15 or Monday October 14?
> >
>
> Sorry, its Tuesday the 15th [0]. Monday is a holiday in California at
> least.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
