On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:33 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the feedback!
>
> On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 15:58 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> > Thanks for publicizing this and all the work that has gone into
> > getting
> > this far.
> >
> > I'm extremely supportive of the foundational
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 7:33 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the feedback!
>
> On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 15:58 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> > Thanks for publicizing this and all the work that has gone into
> > getting
> > this far.
> >
> > I'm extremely supportive of the foundational
I've always found the duality of zero-d arrays an scalars confusing, and
I'm sure I'm not alone.
Having both is just plain weird.
But, backward compatibility aside, could we have ONLY Scalars?
When we index into an array, the dimensionality is reduced by one, so
indexing into a 1D array has to g
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Gregory Lee wrote:
> If i can get a link to a file that shows how dunder methods help with
>> having cool coding APIs that would be great!
>>
>>
> You may want to take a look at PEP 465 as an example, then. If I recall
> correctly, the __matmul__ method described in
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 11:45 -0700, Chris Barker wrote:
> I've always found the duality of zero-d arrays an scalars confusing,
> and
> I'm sure I'm not alone.
>
> Having both is just plain weird.
I guess so, it is a tricky situation, and I do not really have an
answer.
>
> But, backward compatib
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 18:23 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
> > If we were designing a new programming language around array
> > computing
> > principles, I do think that would be the approach I would want to
> > take/consider. But I simply lack the vision of how marrying the
> > idea
> > with the sc
