Why does fancy indexing have this behavior?
>>> a = np.empty((0, 1, 2))
>>> b = np.empty((1, 1, 2))
>>> a[np.array([10, 10])]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
IndexError: index 10 is out of bounds for axis 0 with size 0
>>> a[:, np.array([10, 10])]
array([], shape=(0, 2, 2
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 16:23 -0600, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Why does fancy indexing have this behavior?
>
> > > > a = np.empty((0, 1, 2))
> > > > b = np.empty((1, 1, 2))
> > > > a[np.array([10, 10])]
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> IndexError: index 10 is out of bounds
Ah, so I guess I caught this issue right as it got fixed. There are no
warnings in 1.19.0, but I can confirm I get the warnings in numpy
master. 1.19.1 isn't on conda yet, but I tried building it and didn't
get the warning there. So I guess I need to wait for 0.19.2.
How long do deprecation cycles
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:55 PM Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Ah, so I guess I caught this issue right as it got fixed. There are no
> warnings in 1.19.0, but I can confirm I get the warnings in numpy
> master. 1.19.1 isn't on conda yet, but I tried building it and didn't
> get the warning there. So I g
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 16:55 -0600, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Ah, so I guess I caught this issue right as it got fixed. There are
> no
Yes, on a general note. Advanced indexing grew over time in a maze of
paths, and things like empty arrays were long not too well supported in
many parts of NumPy. That
> About your warnings, do you have a nice way to do that? The mechanism
> for warnings does not really give a good way to catch that a warning
> was raised and then turn it into an error. Unless someone contributes
> a slick way to do it, I am not sure the complexity pays off.
I don't really kno