Hi all,
During the discussion about NEP-35, there have been lots of
discussions around the NEP process itself. In the interest of allowing
people who are mostly interested in this discussion and to avoid
drifting so much off-topic in that thread, I'm starting this new
thread to discuss the NEP pro
Hi all,
This thread has IMO drifted very far from its original purpose, due to that
I decided to start a new thread specifically for the general NEP procedure
discussed, please check your mail for "NEP Procedure Discussion" subject.
On the topic of this thread, I'll try to rewrite NEP-35 to make
Also, not to be a complete slacker, I'd like to add to this list;
- How can I help as an external lib maintainer?
- Do you even want us to get involved before the final draft? Or wait until
internal discussion finishes?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 1:23 PM Peter Andreas Entschev
wrote:
> Hi all,
Somewhat relevant, this is the discussion around the same topic we've been
having in scikit-learn:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/enhancement_proposals/pull/30
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 2:36 PM Ilhan Polat wrote:
> Also, not to be a complete slacker, I'd like to add to this list;
>
> - How can I
This is because slicing with a boolean has just no confusing meaning I
can think of [1]. NumPy even used to reject it, but there seems no
reason to add maintenance/code complexity (i.e. duplicate code from
Python already provides) to reject bools. There used to be a reason to
using `__index__()` i
Hi all!
This is a reminder that our next Documentation Team meeting will be on *Monday,
August 17* at 3PM UTC**. If you wish to join on Zoom, you need to use this
link
https://zoom.us/j/420005230
Here's the permanent hackmd document with the meeting notes (still being
updated in the next few day
