This is great work. Thanks to everyone who contributed. Very clean
user-interface too.
One question: Can we propose feature requests already or is that discussion
closed?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:21 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to share an update on this topic. The draft array
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:56 AM Ilhan Polat wrote:
> This is great work. Thanks to everyone who contributed. Very clean
> user-interface too.
>
> One question: Can we propose feature requests already or is that
> discussion closed?
>
It's not closed, this is the start of community review so if
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:15 PM YueCompl wrote:
> This is great!
>
> I'm working on some Haskell based mmap shared array lib, with Python like
> surface language API. I would adhere to such standard very willingly.
>
Awesome. Library authors from other languages is definitely something else
we
I added discussing my proposal to the upcoming meeting agenda.
I thought of a refinement. Since numpy data types don't have static
methods, instead of using "timestamp64.now()" it could be another function
of the constructor. So timestamp64() will return the current timestamp in
microseconds, and
This is great!
I'm working on some Haskell based mmap shared array lib, with Python like
surface language API. I would adhere to such standard very willingly.
A quick skim but I can't find dataframe related info, that's scheduled for the
future? Will take Pandas as primary reference?
Thanks wi
