[Numpy-discussion] Re: [RFC] - numpy/SVML appears to be poorly optimized

2021-11-06 Thread Noah Goldstein
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 1:38 PM Devulapalli, Raghuveer wrote: > > They are meant to be optimized. Any contribution to improve them further is > more than welcome. Fantastic. I don't see any tests for any of the functions in there. Does anyone know where I can find them? > > Raghuveer > > -Ori

[Numpy-discussion] Re: [RFC] - numpy/SVML appears to be poorly optimized

2021-11-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 1:18 PM Noah Goldstein wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 1:38 PM Devulapalli, Raghuveer > wrote: > > > > They are meant to be optimized. Any contribution to improve them further > is more than welcome. > > Fantastic. I don't see any tests for any of the functions in there. >

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Deprecate np.MachAr?

2021-11-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:20 PM bas van beek wrote: > Hi all, > > > > The subject of `MachAr` recently came up in > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/20132 and > > an earlier community meeting, more notably: it’s questionably role as > public (and even private?) API. > > > > Ever since the intr

[Numpy-discussion] Re: [RFC] - numpy/SVML appears to be poorly optimized

2021-11-06 Thread Sayed Adel
> appears to be poorly optimized. It should perform well, not poor neither heavily optimized. > this also makes it quite difficult to improve (with either a better compiler > or by hand). We can put the blame on Intel for not sharing their source code but honestly, it seems we had no other optio