On Fri, Nov 25, 2022, at 08:33, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> I would like to formally propose accepting NEP 51. Without any concern
> voiced, we will consider it accepted within 7 days.
+1
We should update the NEP to match any changes made later, like `np.str_` and
`np.bool_`, so that we have a good
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:36 AM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to formally propose accepting NEP 51. Without any concern
> voiced, we will consider it accepted within 7 days.
>
> As a reminder, this is to change the representation of NumPy scalars to
> be consistent and includ
See issue https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/22569.
The debate is whether np.testing.asset_equal should support
collections.Sequence objects.
As you can see, a bug has been reported and an easy fix has been suggested.
What is the general view on adding support in testing for Sequence object
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022, at 07:21, i...@markopacak.com wrote:
> The debate is whether np.testing.asset_equal should support
> collections.Sequence objects.
assert list(sequence1) == list(sequence2)
should do the trick, and also handles int vs float and nan comparisons.
> What is the general view
