[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.24.0rc2 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.24.0rc1. The NumPy 1.24.0 release continues the ongoing work to improve the handling and promotion of dtypes, increase execution speed, and clarify the documentation. There are also a large number of new and expire

[Numpy-discussion] Re: status of long double support and what to do about it

Hello, I am interested in contributing to this. I am a contributor in the PINT pulsar timing package Scott mentioned. But I am new to contributing to numpy, and I am not sure where or how to begin. Are there beginner-level resources that I can look at? Regards Abhimanyu Susobhanan Postdoctora

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Adding bit_count ufunc

Hi all, Thanks for the suggestions! I have gotten the PR to a working state with UT on top of the latest main (PR ). So it looks to me like this new ufunc should be called `bitwise_count` > rather than `bit_count`. This does sound like a good idea, but

[Numpy-discussion] next NumPy community meeting

The next NumPy community meeting will be held this Wednesday, December 7th at 19:00 (7 pm) UTC. Join us via Zoom: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83278611437?pwd=ekhoLzlHRjdWc0NOY2FQM0NPemdkZz09 Everyone is welcome and encouraged to attend. To add to the meeting agenda the topics you’d like to discuss, f

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Adding bit_count ufunc

On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 6:30 PM Ganesh Kathiresan wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the suggestions! I have gotten the PR to a working state with > UT on top of the latest main (PR > ). > > So it looks to me like this new ufunc should be called `bitwise_cou

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Adding bit_count ufunc

> > as long as the correspondence is mentioned in the docstring this should > be discoverable enough Ah ok, that's a good point. I will make the change. Thanks! ~Ganesh On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 3:21 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 6:30 PM Ganesh Kathiresan > wrote: > >> Hi