Hi all,
TL;DR: NumPy should endorse some or all of the new SPECs if we like
them. If you don't or do like them, please discuss, otherwise I
suspect we will propose and endorsing them soon and do it if a few core
maintainers agree.
---
The Scientific Python project has the SPEC process to write
It seems to me that we should only endorse SPECs that we ourselves
implement, otherwise it is kind of "do as I say, not as I do". For
instance, it would be strange to endorse SPEC0 but stay with NEP 29.
If we are to endorse SPEC0 without changing our version end-of-life
timing, we should at least m
I second Matti's comments about the validity of endorsing things we don't
implement.
Also, personally I really dislike the keys to castle spec, because I'm
generally against having yearly check in reviews and such.
--- Rohit
From: Sebastian Berg
Sent: Monday
On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 15:52 +0300, matti picus via NumPy-Discussion
wrote:
> It seems to me that we should only endorse SPECs that we ourselves
> implement, otherwise it is kind of "do as I say, not as I do". For
> instance, it would be strange to endorse SPEC0 but stay with NEP 29.
> If we are to
