> Robert Kern wrote:
> But now, I think I misunderstand some things : I thought that g77 was
> the 3.* version of the fortran compiler, and gfortran the 4.* one. But
> it looks like they are also different in the fortran dialect they are
> supporting (I know nothing about fortran). So should I use
"Barry Wark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I agree. I wasn't coming at so much from the goal of making Pylab
> a Matlab clone (as you point out, that's silly, and misses much of the
> advantage of Python), but rather from the goal of making interactive
> use as efficient as possible. When I f
Thanks for all the useful comments. Some feedback about the improved version of
my code snippet. For a 40x40 matrix and d=1 the new version is 44 times faster,
and for d=2 it's 27 times faster. For my astronomical images (typical
2000x2000)
the new version saves my day.
# improved version
d = 1
N
Hi,
On 2/25/07, Jouni K. Seppänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose these things could be addressed quite neatly by IPython.
> It could even modify your history similarly to what it currently
> does with the %magic commands, so that when you type
Feel free to play with implementing this, it
Sturla Molden wrote:
>
>
> g77 is a Fortran 77 compiler. The development of g77 is halted.
>
> gfortran is a Fortran 77, 90, and 95 compiler. It is the current Fortran
> compiler in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC).
>
>
> You can compile the reference implementation of BLAS and LAPACK with both
>
David Cournapeau wrote:
> Sturla Molden wrote:
>>
>> g77 is a Fortran 77 compiler. The development of g77 is halted.
>>
>> gfortran is a Fortran 77, 90, and 95 compiler. It is the current Fortran
>> compiler in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC).
>>
>>
>> You can compile the reference implementation
