Alan G Isaac wrote:
> I would think that
> multinomial(1,prob,size=ntrials).sum(axis=0)
> would be equivalent to
> multinomial(ntrials,prob)
> but the first gives a surprising result. (See below.)
> Explanation?
Pretty much anyone who derives their binomial distribution algorithm from
htt
Alan G Isaac wrote:
> I would think that
> multinomial(1,prob,size=ntrials).sum(axis=0)
> would be equivalent to
> multinomial(ntrials,prob)
> but the first gives a surprising result. (See below.)
> Explanation?
A bug in rk_binomial_inversion(). Unfortunately, this looks like a logical bu
I would think that
multinomial(1,prob,size=ntrials).sum(axis=0)
would be equivalent to
multinomial(ntrials,prob)
but the first gives a surprising result. (See below.)
Explanation?
Thank you,
Alan Isaac
>>> ntrials = 10
>>> prob = N.arange(100,dtype=N.float32)/4950
>>> multinomial(1,
Steven H. Rogers wrote:
> Fernando Perez wrote:
>> The whole scipy.org site seems down. Is it just on my end?
>>
> Works for me, though it seems pretty slow.
The system has been restarted.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is m
Fernando Perez wrote:
> The whole scipy.org site seems down. Is it just on my end?
>
Works for me, though it seems pretty slow.
# Steve
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-disc
Fernando Perez wrote:
> The whole scipy.org site seems down. Is it just on my end?
No. Our new IT guy, Ryan Earl , is on the case.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though
The whole scipy.org site seems down. Is it just on my end?
Cheers,
f
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Dec 5, 2007 1:05 PM, Pearu Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, December 5, 2007 8:38 pm, Fernando Perez wrote:
> ...
> > And I see this message in the build:
> >
> > In: mwrep.pyf:mwrep:unknown_interface:createblocks
> > _get_depend_dict: no dependence info for 'len'
>
> This is due to
On Wed, December 5, 2007 8:38 pm, Fernando Perez wrote:
...
> And I see this message in the build:
>
> In: mwrep.pyf:mwrep:unknown_interface:createblocks
> _get_depend_dict: no dependence info for 'len'
This is due to a typo introduced in r4511 and is now fixed in
r4553. This bug should not affect
Hi all,
I have a quick question on f2py. I have a fortran lib I've wrapped
for a while and was updating one routine today, when I noticed a
message I'm curious about. The .pyf file contains this signature:
subroutine
createblocks(nnod,ll,nscale,nterms,pp,qq,aoffset,iflag,rintphi,rnorm)
>> import numpy.matlib as M
>> x = M.asmatrix(['a', 'b', 'c'])
>> x == 'a'
array([[ True, False, False]], dtype=bool) # < I expected a matrix
>> x = M.asmatrix([1, 2, 3])
>> x == 1
matrix([[ True, False, False]], dtype=bool) # < This looks good
>>
>> M.__version__
'1.0.5.dev4445'
11 matches
Mail list logo
