Could someone review the patch at
http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/825, please?
The issue prevents the test suite running successfully on Sparc, so
I'd like to see it fixed.
--
Neil Muller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Hi all,
Why can't a person construct a complex number with an infinite complex
part and a zero real part?
1 + 1j*np.inf == (nan + infj) # because np.inf * 1j == (nan + infj)
There is a workaround:
z = np.array([0], dtype=complex)
z.imag = np.inf
but that's not very pleasant.
Is this a bug,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Neil Muller
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Could someone review the patch at
http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/825, please?
The issue prevents the test suite running successfully on Sparc, so
I'd like to see it fixed.
Looks like the copybuffer
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
Could someone review the patch at
http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/825, please?
The issue prevents the test suite
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
Could someone review the patch at
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, the problem in the UNICODE_{get,set}item routines is converting between
ucs4 and the encoding python is using, which may be ucs2. But there is
something strange if sparc is using ucs4 (Py_UNICODE_WIDE) and the
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you make the convention chosen for the examples (currently only in
the doc wiki, not yet in SVN) to work: assuming import numpy as np in
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Neil Muller
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, the problem in the UNICODE_{get,set}item routines is converting
between
ucs4 and the encoding python is using, which may be
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, the problem in the UNICODE_{get,set}item
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 07:42, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Why can't a person construct a complex number with an infinite complex
part and a zero real part?
1 + 1j*np.inf == (nan + infj) # because np.inf * 1j == (nan + infj)
In [1]: from numpy import *
In [3]: 1j
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
Why can't a person construct a complex number with an infinite complex
part and a zero real part?
1 + 1j*np.inf == (nan + infj) # because np.inf * 1j == (nan + infj)
There is a workaround:
z =
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I wonder if this case isn't supposed to be caught by this
fragment:
if (!PyArray_ISBEHAVED(ap)) {
buffer = _pya_malloc(mysize 2);
if (buffer == NULL)
return PyErr_NoMemory();
2008/6/25 Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In [1]: from numpy import *
In [3]: 1j == (0+1j)
Out[3]: True
In [4]: 0*inf
Out[4]: nan
Fair enough.
How about
z = np.complex(0, np.inf)
z**2 == (nannanj)
Shouldn't that be -inf?
Regards
Stéfan
___
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks to me like the NPY_ALIGNED flag is incorrectly set. Can you check
this by printing the results of
PyArray_CHKFLAGS(ap, NPY_ALIGNED)
For the test listed in the ticket, the array isn't flagged as aligned
-
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 15:16, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/25 Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In [1]: from numpy import *
In [3]: 1j == (0+1j)
Out[3]: True
In [4]: 0*inf
Out[4]: nan
Fair enough.
How about
z = np.complex(0, np.inf)
z**2 == (nannanj)
Shouldn't
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Neil Muller
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, the problem in the UNICODE_{get,set}item routines is converting
between
ucs4 and the encoding python is using, which may be
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Neil Muller
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I wonder if this case isn't supposed to be caught by this
fragment:
if (!PyArray_ISBEHAVED(ap)) {
buffer =
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you make the convention chosen for the examples (currently only in
the doc wiki, not yet in SVN) to work: assuming import numpy as np in
examples?
Are there any other implicit imports that we will need? How about for
Hi Neil,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Neil Muller
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks to me like the NPY_ALIGNED flag is incorrectly set. Can you check
this by printing the results of
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Neil,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks to me like the NPY_ALIGNED
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Neil,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:46 PM,
21 matches
Mail list logo
