On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Friedrich Romstedt <
friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/3/5 Pierre GM :
> > 'm'fraid no. I gonna have to investigate that. Please open a ticket with
> a self-contained example that reproduces the issue.
> > Thx in advance...
> > P.
>
> I would like to stress
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Friedrich Romstedt <
friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> First, to David's routine:
>
> 2010/3/7 David Goldsmith :
> > def convert_close(arg):
> > arg = N.array(arg)
> > if not arg.shape:
> > arg = N.array((arg,))
> > if arg.size:
> > t
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 07:00:03PM +, René Dudfield wrote:
> 1. Mmap'd files are useful since you can reuse disk cache as program
> memory. So large files don't waste ram on the disk cache.
I second that. mmaping has worked very well for me for large datasets,
especialy in the context of re
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> Francesc,
>
>> Yeah, 10% of improvement by using multi-cores is an expected figure for
>> memory
>> bound problems. This is something people must know: if their computations
>> are
>> memory bound (and this is much more common that one may in
2010/3/5 Pierre GM :
> 'm'fraid no. I gonna have to investigate that. Please open a ticket with a
> self-contained example that reproduces the issue.
> Thx in advance...
> P.
I would like to stress the fact that imo this is maybe not ticket and not a bug.
The issue arises when calling a.max() or
First, to David's routine:
2010/3/7 David Goldsmith :
> def convert_close(arg):
> arg = N.array(arg)
> if not arg.shape:
> arg = N.array((arg,))
> if arg.size:
> t = N.array([0 if N.allclose(temp, 0) else temp for temp in arg])
> if len(t.shape) - 1:
>
