Re: [Numpy-discussion] Workaround for Ticket #1504 (MKL linking)

On 11/15/2010 06:23 AM, Felix wrote: > is there any workaround or fix for the problem described in Ticket > 1504? > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1504 > > Using static linking sounds like it could be the easiest solution. Can > numpy.distutils be used to do that? > You can try to see

[Numpy-discussion] Workaround for Ticket #1504 (MKL linking)

is there any workaround or fix for the problem described in Ticket 1504? http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1504 Using static linking sounds like it could be the easiest solution. Can numpy.distutils be used to do that? Thank you for any tips Felix __

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Simple broadcasting? Or not so simple?? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 21:55, wrote: > Dear list, > > I thought I understood broadcasting, but now I'm not so sure. > > I've simplified as much as I can, so here goes.  I have two input arrays of > shape (1, 3, 1).  I want to select elements from one or other of the input > arrays depending on

[Numpy-discussion] Simple broadcasting? Or not so simple?? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Dear list, I thought I understood broadcasting, but now I'm not so sure. I've simplified as much as I can, so here goes. I have two input arrays of shape (1, 3, 1). I want to select elements from one or other of the input arrays depending on whether the corresponding element of a third array

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Where did the github numpy repository go?

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Robin Kraft wrote: > Git is having some kind of major outage: > http://status.github.com/ > "The site and git access is unavailable due to a database failure. We're > researching the issue." A good excuse for a long lazy Sunday... Matthew ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Where did the github numpy repository go?

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:29:03PM -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: >I keep getting page does not exist. It looks like github is having difficulties currently. ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/l

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Where did the github numpy repository go?

> Chuck > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20101114/3381d8a4/attachment.html > > > -- > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.genfromtxt converters issue

On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Lluís wrote: > This will work as long as 'first_values' is assured to always contain > valid data and as long as its indexes are equivalent to those in > converters (which I simply haven't checked). I beat you to it, actually ;) Check the git push I committed earlier

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.genfromtxt converters issue

Pierre GM writes: > On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:31 PM, Lluís wrote: >> Pierre GM writes: >> >>> In practice, that's exactly what happens below the hood when >>> genfromtxt tries to guess the output type of the converter. It tries a >>> single value ('1'), fails, and decides that the result must be an

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems testing the floating point flags

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good point. I was trying to keep the fpeclear in front of the code to be > tested. > > Yeah, I hadn't considered that possibility too seriously. Hopefully as long as the compiler doesn't see a reason to reord

[Numpy-discussion] Where did the github numpy repository go?

I keep getting page does not exist. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems testing the floating point flags

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Another possible solution is like so: >> >> static __attribute__ ((noinline)) int >> fpecheck(int *status) >> { >> *status = PyUFunc_getfper

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems testing the floating point flags

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Another possible solution is like so: > > static __attribute__ ((noinline)) int > fpecheck(int *status) > { > *status = PyUFunc_getfperr(); > return 0; > } > > static __attribute__ ((noinline)) int > fpeclear(int *status) > { >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems testing the floating point flags

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > This is in reference to numpy ticket > #1671and the comments on pull > request 13 . The original problem > was that the gcc compiler was reo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pyc and pyo files in dmg and other python3 questions also a dmg for python3.1 to try

On 11/14/2010 05:03 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Vincent Davis >> wrote: >>> >>> The questions below regard the osx dmg installer, not sure about how >>> this applies to other installers. >>> >>> I noti

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems testing the floating point flags

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > This is in reference to numpy ticket > #1671and the comments on pull > request 13 . The original problem > was that the gcc compiler was reo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pyc and pyo files in dmg and other python3 questions also a dmg for python3.1 to try

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Vincent Davis > wrote: >> >> The questions below regard the osx dmg installer, not sure about how >> this applies to other installers. >> >> I noticed that pyc and pyo files are included in the binaries. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pyc and pyo files in dmg and other python3 questions also a dmg for python3.1 to try

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > The questions below regard the osx dmg installer, not sure about how > this applies to other installers. > > I noticed that pyc and pyo files are included in the binaries. Is > there a reason for this? I have removed them in the dmg for pytho