On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> > I've just made pull request 105:
> >
> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
> >
> > This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
> > which behave analogously to the
Sorry, looks like I forgot to rebase against master as Chuck pointed out.
-Mark
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> > I've just made pull request 105:
> >
> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
> >
> > This adds public API PyArra
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>
>> I've just made pull request 105:
>>
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
>>
>> This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
>> which behave analogo
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> I've just made pull request 105:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
>
> This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
> which behave analogously to the corresponding unmasked functions. To expose
> this with a
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> I've just made pull request 105:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
>
> This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
> which behave analogously to the corresponding unmasked functions. To
> expose this with a reasonable
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>
>> On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>> > I've just made pull request 105:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
>> >
>> > This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopy
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> > I've just made pull request 105:
> >
> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
> >
> > This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
> > which behave analogously to the c
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> I've just made pull request 105:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
>
> This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
> which behave analogously to the corresponding unmasked functions. To
> expose this with a reasonable
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
which behave analogously to the corresponding unmasked functions. To expose
this with a reasonable interface, I added a function np.copyto, which takes
Hi Bruce,
I'm replying on the list instead of on github, to make it easier for
others to join in the discussion if they want. [For those joining in:
this was a comment posted at https://gist.github.com/1068264 ]
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:36 AM, bsouthey wrote:
> I presume missing float values cou
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>>> On 07/08/2011 08:58 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
Just checking - but is this:
On Fri
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>> On 07/08/2011 08:58 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just checking - but is this:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>>> ...
The one thin
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 08:58 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just checking - but is this:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>> ...
>>> The one thing that we do need now is the code that implements the small
>>> set
On 07/08/2011 08:58 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just checking - but is this:
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> ...
>> The one thing that we do need now is the code that implements the small
>> set of core ideas (array creation and simple numerical operations).
>> Ho
Den 07.07.2011 14:10, skrev Jens Jørgen Mortensen:
> So, this means I can't count on new arrays being C-contiguous any more.
> I guess there is a good reason for this.
Work with linear algebra (LAPACK) caused excessive and redundant array
transpositions. Arrays would be transposed from C to Fortr
Den 07.07.2011 15:24, skrev Yoshi Rokuko:
> thank you for pointing that out!
>
> so how do you change your numpy related c code now, would you like to share?
>
Regardless or memory layout, we can always access element array[i,j,k]
like this:
const int s0 = array->strides[0];
const int s1 = array
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:59 PM, James Bergstra
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:03 AM, James Bergstra
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In numpy 1.5.1, the functions PyArray_MoveInto and PyArray_CopyInto
>>> don't appear to treat strides corr
On 07.07.2011, at 7:16PM, Robert Pyle wrote:
> .../Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/numeric.py:1922:
> RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in absolute
> return all(less_equal(absolute(x-y), atol + rtol * absolute(y)))
>
>
Hi,
Just checking - but is this:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
...
> The one thing that we do need now is the code that implements the small
> set of core ideas (array creation and simple numerical operations).
> Hopefully that will provide a better grasp of the concepts a
I'm not sure what you mean, when you ask if the Python modules
are the same. EPD 7.1 includes ETS 4.0.
- Ilan
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Robert Love wrote:
>
> How does this match up with the recently announced release of ETS-4.0? Are
> the versions of the python modules the same?
>
>
>
On 07/08/2011 07:15 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi Travis,
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to first apologize for stepping into this discussion a bit late and
>> for not being able to participate adequately. However, I want to offer a
>> cou
How does this match up with the recently announced release of ETS-4.0? Are the
versions of the python modules the same?
On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:37 AM, Ilan Schnell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am pleased to announce that EPD (Enthought Python Distribution)
> version 7.1 has been released. The most
Hi Travis,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I want to first apologize for stepping into this discussion a bit late and
> for not being able to participate adequately. However, I want to offer a
> couple of perspectives, and my opinion about what we should
I'll answer my own question. It was a mix of using two different fortran
compilers so specified the option: python setup.py config_fc
--fcompiler=gfortran build.
All seems to be going well now.
On 07/08/2011 05:35 PM, Jeffrey Spencer wrote:
That actually makes sense because I am not sure the
That actually makes sense because I am not sure the gnu that it was compiled
with but I think it is different. I have since compiled gcc myself, then
python, and atlas libraries. Then I tried to install numpy. It go tthrough
the install no worries and found the correct libraries. It stuffed when I
25 matches
Mail list logo
