There is also:
Missing/accumulating data
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2011-July/057406.html
An NA compromise idea -- many-NA
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2011-July/057408.html
NEPaNEP lessons - was: alterNEP
I have picked up a strange limit to np.in1d():
--
b
Out[100]:
array(['2007-01-01T02:30:00+0200', '2007-01-01T03:00:00+0200',
'2007-01-01T03:30:00+0200', ..., '2008-01-01T01:00:00+0200',
'2008-01-01T01:30:00+0200', '2008-01-01T02:00:00+0200'],
dtype='datetime64[s]')
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
That reminds me of the old joke about the Irishman giving directions -
If I were you, I wouldn't start from here.
Sounds about accurate `1
I would rather spend some time on implementing/integrating portable
quad
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess from your answer that such a warning would be complicated to
implement, and if that's the case, I can imagine it would be low
priority.
I assume the problem is more that it would be a weirdo check that
26.10.2011 09:09, Grové kirjoitti:
I have picked up a strange limit to np.in1d():
--
b
Out[100]:
array(['2007-01-01T02:30:00+0200', '2007-01-01T03:00:00+0200',
'2007-01-01T03:30:00+0200', ..., '2008-01-01T01:00:00+0200',
'2008-01-01T01:30:00+0200',
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I guess from your answer that such a warning would be complicated to
implement, and if that's the case, I can imagine it would be low
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
So, I am very interested in making sure I remember the details of the
counterproposal. What I recall is that you wanted to be able to
differentiate between a bit-pattern mask and a boolean-array mask in the
26.10.2011 10:07, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I guess from your answer that such a warning would be complicated to
implement, and if that's the case, I can imagine it would be low
priority.
I assume the problem