Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA masks in the next numpy release?

2011-10-26 Thread Han Genuit
There is also: Missing/accumulating data http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2011-July/057406.html An NA compromise idea -- many-NA http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2011-July/057408.html NEPaNEP lessons - was: alterNEP

[Numpy-discussion] np.in1d() capacity limit?

2011-10-26 Thread Grové
I have picked up a strange limit to np.in1d(): -- b Out[100]: array(['2007-01-01T02:30:00+0200', '2007-01-01T03:00:00+0200', '2007-01-01T03:30:00+0200', ..., '2008-01-01T01:00:00+0200', '2008-01-01T01:30:00+0200', '2008-01-01T02:00:00+0200'], dtype='datetime64[s]')

Re: [Numpy-discussion] float128 / longdouble on PPC - is it broken?

2011-10-26 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: That reminds me of the old joke about the Irishman giving directions - If I were you, I wouldn't start from here. Sounds about accurate `1 I would rather spend some time on implementing/integrating portable quad

Re: [Numpy-discussion] float128 / longdouble on PPC - is it broken?

2011-10-26 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: I guess from your answer that such a warning would be complicated to implement, and if that's the case, I can imagine it would be low priority. I assume the problem is more that it would be a weirdo check that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.in1d() capacity limit?

2011-10-26 Thread Pauli Virtanen
26.10.2011 09:09, Grové kirjoitti: I have picked up a strange limit to np.in1d(): -- b Out[100]: array(['2007-01-01T02:30:00+0200', '2007-01-01T03:00:00+0200', '2007-01-01T03:30:00+0200', ..., '2008-01-01T01:00:00+0200', '2008-01-01T01:30:00+0200',

Re: [Numpy-discussion] float128 / longdouble on PPC - is it broken?

2011-10-26 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: I guess from your answer that such a warning would be complicated to implement, and if that's the case, I can imagine it would be low

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NA masks in the next numpy release?

2011-10-26 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com wrote: So, I am very interested in making sure I remember the details of the counterproposal.    What I recall is that you wanted to be able to differentiate between a bit-pattern mask and a boolean-array mask in the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] float128 / longdouble on PPC - is it broken?

2011-10-26 Thread Pauli Virtanen
26.10.2011 10:07, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: I guess from your answer that such a warning would be complicated to implement, and if that's the case, I can imagine it would be low priority. I assume the problem