On 14 May 2012 21:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre
On 14 May 2012 21:54, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:31 PM, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 May 2012
On 05/15/2012 12:42 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 14 May 2012 21:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson
2012/5/15 Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
On May 14, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Hi Zach
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Zachary Pincus zachary.pin...@yale.edu
wrote:
The below seems to be a bug, but perhaps it's unavoidably part of the
indexing mechanism?
Hi,
In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add the
flag for people that want to use it.
Why?
1) There is probably 10k script that use it that will need to be
checked for correctness. There won't be easy to see crash or error
that allow user to see it.
2) This is a
Hi,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote:
I assumed as much, in any case I was going to start with dense arrays,
simply because they are in common use and well-defined at this point.
Maybe what we really want is just lazy evaluation that works for
On 05/13/2012 12:27 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre
On 05/14/2012 06:03 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
What happens, though when you have
a[:, in1 :, in2]?
in1 and in2 are broadcasted together to create a two-dimensional
sub-space that must fit somewhere. Where should it go? Should
it replace in1 or in2?I.e. should the output be
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Sandro Tosi matrixh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the
Hi, if there's anyone wants to have a look at the above issue this
week,
that would be great.
If there's a patch by this weekend I can create a second RC, so we can
still have the final release before the end of this month (needed for
Debian freeze). Otherwise a second RC won't be needed.
LinkedIn
J'aimerais vous inviter à rejoindre mon réseau professionnel en ligne, sur le
site LinkedIn.
Angelo
Angelo Lama
Enseignant chez Education Nationale
Région du Havre , France
Veuillez confirmer que vous connaissez Angelo Lama :
11 matches
Mail list logo
