[Numpy-discussion] Invitation à se connecter sur LinkedIn

LinkedIn J'aimerais vous inviter à rejoindre mon réseau professionnel en ligne, sur le site LinkedIn. Angelo Angelo Lama Enseignant chez Education Nationale Région du Havre , France Veuillez confirmer que vous connaissez Angelo Lama : https://www.linkedin.com/e/y0t7lq-h29imymd-2

[Numpy-discussion] Debian/Ubuntu patch help (was: ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1)

> Hi, if there's anyone wants to have a look at the above issue this > week, >that would be great. > If there's a patch by this weekend I can create a second RC, so we can > still have the final release before the end of this month (needed for > Debian freeze). Otherwise a second RC won't be neede

[Numpy-discussion] Debian/Ubuntu patch help (was: ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1)

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate >> of >> > NumPy 1.6.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fancy-indexing reorders output in corner cases?

On 05/14/2012 06:03 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > What happens, though when you have > > a[:, in1 :, in2]? > > in1 and in2 are broadcasted together to create a two-dimensional > "sub-space" that must fit somewhere. Where should it go? Should > it replace in1 or in2?I.e. should the output be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fancy-indexing reorders output in corner cases?

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > What happens, though when you have > > a[:, in1 :, in2]? > [...] > > To "resolve" this ambiguity, the code sends the (3,4) sub-space to the front > of the "dimensions" and returns (3,4,10,8).   In retro-spect, the code should > raise an e

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

On 05/13/2012 12:27 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no>> wrote: > > On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: > > On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre > Seljebotn

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

Hi, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, mark florisson wrote: > I assumed as much, in any case I was going to start with dense arrays, > simply because they are in common use and well-defined at this point. > Maybe what we really want is just lazy evaluation that works for > different array layouts

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue)

Hi, In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add the flag for people that want to use it. Why? 1) There is probably >10k script that use it that will need to be checked for correctness. There won't be easy to see crash or error that allow user to see it. 2) This is a globa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fancy-indexing reorders output in corner cases?

2012/5/15 Travis Oliphant > > On May 14, 2012, at 7:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > > > Hi Zach > > > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Zachary Pincus > wrote: > >> The below seems to be a bug, but perhaps it's unavoidably part of the > indexing mechanism? > >> > >> It's easiest to show via

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

On 05/15/2012 12:42 PM, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 May 2012 21:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote: >>> >>> On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >>> wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: > > > On 11 May 201

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

On 14 May 2012 21:54, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:31 PM, mark florisson > wrote: >> >> On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> wrote: >> > On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> >>  wrote: >> >>> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

On 14 May 2012 21:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote: >> >> On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn  wrote: > > >>>