On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chuck,
>>>
>>> Could you clarify how we'd know if this is a problem in a large package?
>>> i.e. Is it just Python i
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Jeremy Hetzel wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Mark Szepieniec wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:24 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see a reason that numpy.random shouldn't get new
>>> distributions. It would also be useful to add the correspondin
On 23 September 2013 18:03, Charles R Harris wrote:
> I have gotten no feedback on the removal of the numarray and oldnumeric
> packages. Consequently the removal will take place on 9/28. Scream now or
> never...
>
I know I always like to get feedback either way ... so +1 for removal.
Thanks.
___
