Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for "False convention"

On 2013/09/30 4:57 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> On 2013/09/30 4:05 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris >>> wrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for "False convention"

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 2013/09/30 4:05 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík >>> wrote: Hi, What is the rationale for usin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for "False convention"

On 2013/09/30 4:05 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that >>> should be included? >>> >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: >> > On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for "False convention"

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that >> should be included? >> >> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/maskedarray.generic.htm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for "False convention"

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Hi, > > What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that > should be included? > > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/maskedarray.generic.html > > As opposed to using True for elements that should be included, which >

[Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for "False convention"

Hi, What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that should be included? http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/maskedarray.generic.html As opposed to using True for elements that should be included, which is what I was intuitively expecting when I started using the masked ar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > > On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Ch

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: >> >> On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 30,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do > actually test this! It is really in your best > > interest, and I think p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> >> >> On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do >> actually test this! It is really in your best >> > interest, and I think people don't always r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do > actually test this! It is really in your best > > interest, and I think people don't always realize this. > > > > Here's how it works: > > - If you test it *now*, and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do actually test this! It is really in your best > interest, and I think people don't always realize this. > > Here's how it works: > - If you test it *now*, and it breaks your code that worked with 1.7, > and you *tell* us this now,

[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] MATLAB fmincon now available in Python2

Hi all, current state of Python <-> MATLAB connection soft doesn't allow passing of function handlers, however, a walkaround has been implemented via some tricks, so now MATLAB function fmincon is available in Python-written OpenOpt and FuncDesigner frameworks (with possibility of automatic dif

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

Everyone please do actually test this! It is really in your best interest, and I think people don't always realize this. Here's how it works: - If you test it *now*, and it breaks your code that worked with 1.7, and you *tell* us this now, then it's *our* problem and we hold up the release to fix

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8.0rc1

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 30.09.2013 17:17, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge > > .The > > binary builds are included e

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8.0rc1

On 30.09.2013 17:17, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge > .The > binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which will > arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, an

[Numpy-discussion] 1.8.0rc1

Hi All, NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge.The binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which will arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to those who found and fixed the bugs in the last beta. A