On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:26 AM, m...@pagan.io wrote:
Greetings,
I'm working on an additional function for numpy/lib/twodim_base.py. I'm
trying to add some tests for the new function, and
numpy/lib/tests/test_twodim_base.py seems like the right place for
them.
My problem is travis-ci tells
The test function numpy.testing.assert_equal fails when comparing -0.0 and 0.0:
In [16]: np.testing.assert_equal(-0.0, 0.0)
---
AssertionErrorTraceback (most recent call last)
On 4/12/2014 5:20 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
The set routines [1] are in this category and may help
you deal with partitions, but I would recommend using
boolean arrays instead. If you commonly deal with both
a subset and a complement, set representation does not
give you a memory
Hi,
With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
It works fine, apart from the following test failure:
==
FAIL: test_special (test_umath.TestExpm1)
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Stephan Hoyer sho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Are we in a position to start looking at implementation? If so, it would
be useful to have a collection of test cases, i.e., typical uses
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
It works fine, apart from the following test failure:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
With Carl Kleffner, I am trying to build a numpy 1.8.1 wheel for
Windows 64-bit, and latest stable ATLAS.
It works
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi,
With
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
The test function numpy.testing.assert_equal fails when comparing -0.0 and
0.0:
In [16]: np.testing.assert_equal(-0.0, 0.0)
---
Hi,
mingw has expm1. Is this function suitable?
Regards
Carl
2014-04-14 21:34 GMT+02:00 Eric Moore e...@redtetrahedron.org:
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
no-one has contributed a fix for the VC builds to numpy yet.
On 14.04.2014 22:43, Carl Kleffner wrote:
Hi,
mingw has expm1. Is
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
no-one has contributed a fix for the VC
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The official numpy mingw binaries do not have all these math issues.
Only the VC builds do.
As mingw is fine the functions must be somewhere in the windows API but
no-one has contributed a fix for the VC
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The official numpy mingw
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM,
17 matches
Mail list logo