[Numpy-discussion] Do getitem/setitem already have GIL?

2016-04-20 Thread Steve Mitchell
When writing custom PyArray_ArrFuncs getitem() and setitem(), do I need to acquire the GIL, or has it been done for me already by the caller? --Steve http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/c-api.array.html?highlight=allow_c_api#group-2 http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/internals.cod

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

2016-04-20 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote: > Thanks > > I can confirm that the new narrow unicode build wheels of Scipy works as > expected for my project. > @Oliver Grisel Thanks for finding the Travis issue it's probably worth > considering switching the Travis build to 2.7.11 to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

2016-04-20 Thread Matthew Brett
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > Thanks, > > I think next we could upgrade the travis configuration of numpy and > scipy to build and upload manylinux1 wheels to > http://travis-dev-wheels.scipy.org/ for downstream project to test > against the master branch of numpy and sc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

2016-04-20 Thread Jens Nielsen
Thanks I can confirm that the new narrow unicode build wheels of Scipy works as expected for my project. @Oliver Grisel Thanks for finding the Travis issue it's probably worth considering switching the Travis build to 2.7.11 to avoid other similar issues. The old versions of numpy are very handy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

2016-04-20 Thread Olivier Grisel
Thanks, I think next we could upgrade the travis configuration of numpy and scipy to build and upload manylinux1 wheels to http://travis-dev-wheels.scipy.org/ for downstream project to test against the master branch of numpy and scipy whithout having to build those from source. However that would