Yup.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Steve Waterbury
wrote:
> Me 3! ;)
>
> Steve
>
>
> On 05/18/2016 06:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> Me too.
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Chris Barker
> wrote:
>
> I'll be there.
>
> -CHB
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
>
Me 3! ;)
Steve
On 05/18/2016 06:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Me too.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
I'll be there.
-CHB
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
Hi All,
Out of curiosity, who all here intends to be at Scipy 2016?
Chuck
_
Me too.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I'll be there.
>
> -CHB
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Out of curiosity, who all here intends to be at Scipy 2016?
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> __
I'll be there.
-CHB
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Out of curiosity, who all here intends to be at Scipy 2016?
>
> Chuck
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy
Hi All,
Out of curiosity, who all here intends to be at Scipy 2016?
Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Robert Kern
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On May 17, 2016 1:50 AM, "Robert Kern" wrote:
>>
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Robert Kern
wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Chris Barker
wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > ...anyway, the real reason I'm a bit grumpy is because there are
solid
>> >> > engineering reasons why users *want* this API,
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Chris Barker
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > ...anyway, the real reason I'm a bit grumpy is because there are solid
> >> > engineering reasons why users *want* this API,
> >
> > Honestly, I am lost in the math -- but li
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>>
>> > ...anyway, the real reason I'm a bit grumpy is because there are solid
>> > engineering reasons why users *want* this API,
>
> Honestly, I am lost in the math -- but like any good engineer, I want to
accomplish something anyway :-) I tru
>
> > ...anyway, the real reason I'm a bit grumpy is because there are solid
> > engineering reasons why users *want* this API,
>
Honestly, I am lost in the math -- but like any good engineer, I want to
accomplish something anyway :-) I trust you guys to get this right -- or at
least document what
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Robert Kern
wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> On May 17, 2016 1:50 AM, "Robert Kern" wrote:
> >> >
> >> [...]
> >> > What you want is a function that returns
11 matches
Mail list logo