on, maybe you will find the
implementation instructive. The functions I described take only a few
lines.
John Zwinck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
ly unusual), why force them to always type in the
boilerplate independent=True to make it work?
John Zwinck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
"independent" has no relevance when the array is
1-d, it can simply be ignored.
John Zwinck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 3 Oct 2014 07:09, "T J" wrote:
>
> Any bites on this?
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:23 PM, T J wrote:
>> Python's round function goes away from zero, so I am looking for the
NumPy equivalent (and using vectorize() seems undesirable). In this sense,
it seems that having a ufunc for this type o
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Sebastian Wagner wrote:
> So, for non-structured arrays, the consens is an Exception. The question
> is, which one.
> AttributeError would be fully backwards compatible. Existing code checks
> for the method and if it exists, the object has fields.
> ValueError woul
On 1 Oct 2014 04:30, "Stephan Hoyer" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On more careful reading of your words, I think we agree; indeed, if
keys() is present is should return an iterable; but I don't think it should
be present
this is exactly what I'm aiming at.
Thoughts?
John Zwinck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
