Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2016 attending

2016-05-18 Thread Steve Waterbury
Me 3! ;) Steve On 05/18/2016 06:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Me too. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Chris Barker wrote: I'll be there. -CHB On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: Hi All, Out of curiosity, who all here intends to be at Scipy 2016? Chuck _

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Changes to generalized ufunc core dimension checking

2016-03-19 Thread Steve Waterbury
On 03/16/2016 06:28 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: ... Sounds like a real deprecation cycle would have been better. IMHO for a library as venerable and widely-used as Numpy, a deprecation cycle is almost always better ... consider this a lesson learned. For reference: Mailing list discussion:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Changes to generalized ufunc core dimension checking

2016-03-19 Thread Steve Waterbury
On 03/16/2016 10:32 PM, Fernando Perez wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Steve Waterbury mailto:water...@pangalactic.us>> wrote: On 03/16/2016 06:28 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: ... Sounds like a real deprecation cycle would have been better. IMHO for a libr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

2016-01-15 Thread Steve Waterbury
On 01/15/2016 05:19 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Steve Waterbury wrote: On 01/15/2016 05:07 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: I attribute some of the conda-ignoring to "NIH" and, to some extent, possibly defensiveness (I would be defensive too if I had been work

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

2016-01-15 Thread Steve Waterbury
On 01/15/2016 05:07 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: I attribute some of the conda-ignoring to "NIH" and, to some extent, possibly defensiveness (I would be defensive too if I had been working on pip as long as they had when conda came along ;). I must say, I don't personally recognize those reasons.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

2016-01-15 Thread Steve Waterbury
"it solves a different problem [than pip]" ... hmmm ... I would say it solves the same problem *and more*, *better*. I attribute some of the conda-ignoring to "NIH" and, to some extent, possibly defensiveness (I would be defensive too if I had been working on pip as long as

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sources more confusing in Python

2013-04-07 Thread Steve Waterbury
On 04/07/2013 05:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote: >> 2013/4/7 >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Steve Waterbury >>> wrote: >>>> On 04/07/2013 05:30 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >&g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sources more confusing in Python

2013-04-07 Thread Steve Waterbury
On 04/07/2013 05:30 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Steve Waterbury > wrote: >> On 04/07/2013 05:02 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Daπid wrote: >>>> On 7 April 2013 16:53, Happyman wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sources more confusing in Python

2013-04-07 Thread Steve Waterbury
On 04/07/2013 05:02 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Daπid wrote: >> On 7 April 2013 16:53, Happyman wrote: > >> $pip install numpy # to install package "numpy" > > as a warning, last I checked pip did not support binary installs ... Guess you didn't chec

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please stop bottom posting!!

2013-04-03 Thread Steve Waterbury
On 04/03/2013 08:06 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: Nice editing! ;) Steve ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion