Pauli Virtanen iki.fi> writes:
-snip-
> It's possible that in the cases where Lua wins, the Lua code is not
> completely equivalent to the Fortran code, or uses stuff such as strings
> for which Lua's default implementation may be efficient.
Note - not "Lua's default implementation" but LuaJIT
Sun, 04 Jul 2010 04:32:14 +0200, Sturla Molden wrote:
> I was just looking at Debian's benchmark. LuaJIT is now (on median)
> beating Intel Fortran! Consider that Lua is a dynamic language very
> similar to Python. I know it's "just a benchmark" but this has to count
> as insanely impressive.
I gu
