On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:49 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Peter
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:56 AM, David Cournapeau
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since inspect is used in quite a few places, and that we only use it to
>>> extract arguments from a function, I added
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:56 AM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
>
> Since inspect is used in quite a few places, and that we only use it to
> extract arguments from a function, I added a small numpy.lib.inspect
> module, and ...
Is numpy.lib intended as a public API? How about numpy.lib._inspect
instead
David Cournapeau wrote:
> This branch improves numpy import times quite significantly on slow
> machines:
> I think it largely worths it, and will integrate this unless someone is
> strongly against it or see a problem with the approach,
+1
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Hi,
This branch improves numpy import times quite significantly on slow
machines:
http://github.com/cournape/numpy/tree/noinspect
One of the main culprit is ma, because of inspect (inspect is extremely
slow to import; as a data point, python -c "import inspect" takes 67 ms
vs python -c "" ta
