[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-08 Thread Julian Taylor
Hello, I'm happy to announce the fist beta release of Numpy 1.9.0. 1.9.0 will be a new feature release supporting Python 2.6 - 2.7 and 3.2 - 3.4. Due to low demand windows binaries for the beta are only available for Python 2.7, 3.3 and 3.4. Please try it and report any issues to the numpy-discuss

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > Hello, > > I'm happy to announce the fist beta release of Numpy 1.9.0. > 1.9.0 will be a new feature release supporting Python 2.6 - 2.7 and 3.2 > - 3.4. > Due to low demand windows binaries for the beta are only available for > Python 2.7, 3

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Jaime Fernández del Río
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Julian Taylor < > jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm happy to announce the fist beta release of Numpy 1.9.0. >> 1.9.0 will be a new feature release supporting Python 2.6 - 2.7

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Chris Barker
I take nothing ever happened to clean up the datetime64 timezone mess? sigh. -Chris On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > Hello, > > I'm happy to announce the fist beta release of Numpy 1.9.0. > 1.9.0 will be a new feature release supporting Python 2.6 - 2.7 and 3.2 > - 3.4.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 6/8/2014 1:34 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: Hello, I'm happy to announce the fist beta release of Numpy 1.9.0. 1.9.0 will be a new feature release supporting Python 2.6 - 2.7 and 3.2 - 3.4. Due to low demand windows binaries for the beta are only available for Python 2.7, 3.3 and 3.4. Please try i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > On 6/8/2014 1:34 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm happy to announce the fist beta release of Numpy 1.9.0. >> 1.9.0 will be a new feature release supporting Python 2.6 - 2.7 and 3.2 >> - 3.4. >> Due to low demand windows binar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Jeff Reback
The one pandas test failure that is valid: ERROR: test_interp_regression (pandas.tests.test_generic.TestSeries) has been fixed in pandas master / 0.14.1 (prob releasing in 1 month). (the other test failures are for clipboard / network issues) On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> On 6/8/2014 1:34 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm happy to announce the fist beta release of Numpy 1.9.0. >>> 1.9.0 will be a new feature release support

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Jeff Reback wrote: > The one pandas test failure that is valid: ERROR: test_interp_regression > (pandas.tests.test_generic.TestSeries) > > has been fixed in pandas master / 0.14.1 (prob releasing in 1 month). > > (the other test failures are for clipboard / networ

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Jeff Reback wrote: > >> The one pandas test failure that is valid: ERROR: test_interp_regression >> (pandas.tests.test_generic.TestSeries) >> >> has been fixed in pandas master / 0.14.1 (prob releasi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Jeff Reback wrote: >> >>> The one pandas test failure that is valid: ERROR: test_interp_regression

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread josef . pktd
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Jeff Reback wrote: The one pandas tes

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-09 Thread josef . pktd
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:10 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Charles R Harris >>> wrote: On Mon, Jun 9, 201

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-10 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Mo, 2014-06-09 at 18:21 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > Other errors are of the type: > TypeError: NumPy boolean array indexing assignment requires a 0 or > 1-dimensionalinput, input

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-10 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Di, 2014-06-10 at 10:43 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Mo, 2014-06-09 at 18:21 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Charles R Harris > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Other errors are of the type: > > TypeError:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On 10 Jun 2014 09:44, "Sebastian Berg" wrote: > The other error looks a bit different because of the nonzero logic, but > probably is the same, i.e. also boolean indexing. The last one is the > change that `arr[[1,2,3,4]] = [1,2]` does not work anymore. A workaround > (maybe also for the rest poss

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-10 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Di, 2014-06-10 at 10:50 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On 10 Jun 2014 09:44, "Sebastian Berg" > wrote: > > The other error looks a bit different because of the nonzero logic, > but > > probably is the same, i.e. also boolean indexing. The last one is > the > > change that `arr[[1,2,3,4]] = [1,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On 10 Jun 2014 11:15, "Sebastian Berg" wrote: > > On Di, 2014-06-10 at 10:50 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On 10 Jun 2014 09:44, "Sebastian Berg" > > wrote: > > > The other error looks a bit different because of the nonzero logic, > > but > > > probably is the same, i.e. also boolean indexing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-10 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Di, 2014-06-10 at 11:24 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On 10 Jun 2014 11:15, "Sebastian Berg" > wrote: > > > > On Di, 2014-06-10 at 10:50 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > > On 10 Jun 2014 09:44, "Sebastian Berg" > > > > wrote: > > > > The other error looks a bit different because of the nonz

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-10 Thread Sankarshan Mudkavi
Still working on it, it's unfortunately taking much more time than I'd anticipated. Cheers, Sankarshan Mudkavi On Jun 9, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > I take nothing ever happened to clean up the datetime64 timezone mess? > > sigh. > > -Chris > > > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:34

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.0 beta release

2014-06-12 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Mo, 2014-06-09 at 16:21 -0700, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > On 6/8/2014 1:34 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Hello, > > I tested numpy-MKL-1.9.0b1 (msvc9, Intel MKL build) on win-amd64-py2.7 > against a few other packages that were built against numpy-MKL-1.8.x. > > While numpy and