Hi,
Eelco Hoogendoorn hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this project. While boost.python
is a very nice package, its distributability is nothing short of
nonexistent, so its great to have a pure python binding generator.
One thing which I have
I have; but if I recall correctly, it does not solve the problem of
distributing code that uses it, or does it?
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Toby St Clere Smithe
pyvienn...@tsmithe.net wrote:
Hi,
Eelco Hoogendoorn hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't
Eelco Hoogendoorn hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com writes:
I have; but if I recall correctly, it does not solve the problem of
distributing code that uses it, or does it?
Indeed not. But the Boost licence is very liberal, so I just link it
statically; for source distributions, I just ship a minimal
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this project. While
boost.python is a very nice package, its distributability is nothing short
of nonexistent, so its great to have a pure python binding generator.
I have a file numpy_boost_python.hpp in one of my projects by Michael
Droettboom (can seem to find an online source anymore!), which adds
mappings between numpy.ndarray and boost.ndarray, which is very neat
and seemless. But like boost.python, it tightly couples with the
clusterfuck that is bjam.
Eelco Hoogendoorn hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com writes:
I have a file numpy_boost_python.hpp in one of my projects by Michael
Droettboom (can seem to find an online source anymore!), which adds
mappings between numpy.ndarray and boost.ndarray, which is very neat
and seemless. But like
That is good to know. The boost documentation makes it appear as if bjam is
the only way to build boost.python, but good to see examples to the
contrary!
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Toby St Clere Smithe
pyvienn...@tsmithe.net wrote:
Eelco Hoogendoorn hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com writes:
Eelco Hoogendoorn hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com writes:
That is good to know. The boost documentation makes it appear as if bjam is
the only way to build boost.python, but good to see examples to the
contrary!
Quite. I really wish they would officially adopt something more
sensible, but in the
Hello All,
I am *extremely *pleased to be able to announce the version 0.4 release of
xdress. This version contains much anticipated full support for Clang as a
parser! This is almost entirely due to the efforts of Geoffrey Irving.
Please thank him the next time you get a chance :)
This
Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this project. While boost.python
is a very nice package, its distributability is nothing short of
nonexistent, so its great to have a pure python binding generator.
One thing which I have often found frustrating is natural ndarray interop
between python
10 matches
Mail list logo
