Hello,
Summary: is it possible to distribute, optionally or not, the blas /
lapack libraries that numpy is built against, with the numpy binary
installers?
We at the NIPY project have run into what seems like a recurring
problem; we want to build our code against both numpy and lapack, on
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:44:02PM -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Summary: is it possible to distribute, optionally or not, the blas /
lapack libraries that numpy is built against, with the numpy binary
installers?
You mean the unlinked libraries (.a or .so), and the corresponding
headers, I
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Summary: is it possible to distribute, optionally or not, the blas /
lapack libraries that numpy is built against, with the numpy binary
installers?
Yes, it is possible.
We at the NIPY project
Hi,
We at the NIPY project have run into what seems like a recurring
problem; we want to build our code against both numpy and lapack, on
windows, linux and OS X.
No problem of course if we've done a development install - we already
needed to have blas/lapack.
I am not sure I understand:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:11:13AM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
No problem of course if we've done a development install - we already
needed to have blas/lapack.
I am not sure I understand: why do you need blas/lapack to build
projects ? Does NiPY itself uses blas/lapack ?
NiPy uses
Matthew Brett wrote:
Yes it does...
Ok.
Yes, I know, hence my suggestion of something more practical in the
short term. I wonder whether the installer could be:
by default, smallish, with just numpy, with the option of pulling down
the lapack libraries from the web on installation
