Hi all,
Short version
=
We now have a numpy buildbot running at
http://buildbot.scipy.org
Long version
Albert Strasheim and I set up a buildbot for numpy this week. For
those of you unfamiliar with The Buildbot, it is
"""
...a system to automate the compile/test cycl
Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Short version
> =
>
> We now have a numpy buildbot running at
>
> http://buildbot.scipy.org
>
> Long version
>
>
> Albert Strasheim and I set up a buildbot for numpy this week. For
> those of you unfamiliar with The Buildbot, it is
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 10:11:55AM +0200, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Short version
> =
>
> We now have a numpy buildbot running at
>
> http://buildbot.scipy.org
>
> While we are still working on automatic e-mail notifications, the
> system already provides valuable fee
David M. Cooke wrote:
> Awesome. I've got a iBook (PPC G4) running OS X that can be used as a slave
> (it's just being a server right now).
It looks like they already have a PPC OS-X box. Anyone have an Intel
machine to offer up? (mine's a PPC Dual G5)
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Ocea
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:16:06AM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> David M. Cooke wrote:
> > Awesome. I've got a iBook (PPC G4) running OS X that can be used as a slave
> > (it's just being a server right now).
>
> It looks like they already have a PPC OS-X box. Anyone have an Intel
> machine
David M. Cooke wrote:
> That one's mine. You can tell because it's slow ;-) A 64-bit G5 build
> would be good too, as its longdouble semantics are different IIRC.
Well, I have a DualG5, running OS-X 10.4.9, and Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5
installed (though I'm only using 2.5 for anything new now).
Stefan van der Walt schrieb:
> http://buildbot.scipy.org
>
> If your platform is not currently on the list, please consider
> volunteering a machine as a build slave. This machine will be
> required to run the buildbot client, and to build a new version of
> numpy whenever changes are made to the
I have the potential to add OS X Server Intel (64-bit) and OS X Intel
(32-bit) to the list, if I can convince my boss that the security risk
(including DOS from compile times) is minimal. I've compiled both
numpy and scipy many times, so I'm not worried about resources for a
single compile/test, bu
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:26:15 -0700, "Barry Wark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On a side note, buildbot.scipy.org goes to the DSP lab, Univ. of
> Stellenbosch's home page, not the buildbot status page.
Sorry about that -- I misconfigured Apache. Everything should be fine now.
Cheers
Stéfan
Stefan,
No worries. I thought it was something like that. Any thoughts on my
other questions? I'd love to have some ammunition to take to my boss.
Thanks,
Barry
On 7/7/07, stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:26:15 -0700, "Barry Wark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On a
Hello
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007, Barry Wark wrote:
> I have the potential to add OS X Server Intel (64-bit) and OS X Intel
> (32-bit) to the list, if I can convince my boss that the security risk
Sounds good. We could definitely use these platforms.
> (including DOS from compile times) is minimal. I'
Albert,
Thanks for the info! I will run it by folks here and see what we can
fiure out. We're using numpy and scipy very heavily in our internal
software, so we have an interest in making sure it works on our
platform. Hopefully we (here) can agree on a strategy that will
satisfy me and the IT peo
12 matches
Mail list logo
