Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:09:07 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
[clip]
> You can backport as many docstring changes as possible, since there is
> little chance to break anything just from docstring.
Merge to trunk is here:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/changeset/6725
I'll backport it and some
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:37:28 +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> 2009/3/22 Pauli Virtanen :
>>> There is a small problem, in that when I click on any function is
>>> shows that it is set to "No", with the option to change to "Yes" --
>>> even when the current status is yes!
>>
>> Uh, maybe it's the t
2009/3/22 Pauli Virtanen :
>> There is a small problem, in that when I click on any function is shows
>> that it is set to "No", with the option to change to "Yes" -- even when
>> the current status is yes!
>
> Uh, maybe it's the time of the day, but somehow I fail to understand what
> is the probl
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:33 AM, David Cournapeau <
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> Charles R Harris wrote:
> >
> > Let's announce the RC somewhere prominent on the scipy page so it gets
> > more notice and testing. I didn't see any mention of the beta when I
> > looked today.
>
> Yes, you
Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> Let's announce the RC somewhere prominent on the scipy page so it gets
> more notice and testing. I didn't see any mention of the beta when I
> looked today.
Yes, you're right, I completely forgot it. On a side-note, I think the
whole release process should be more auto
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:09 PM, David Cournapeau <
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> Hi Pauli,
>
> Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > Hi all, (esp. David)
> >
> > Is there still time for a merge from the doc wiki for 1.3.x?
> >
> > Stefan already merged several reviewed docstrings a while ago. My cu
Hi Pauli,
Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Hi all, (esp. David)
>
> Is there still time for a merge from the doc wiki for 1.3.x?
>
> Stefan already merged several reviewed docstrings a while ago. My current
> worry is that there's quite a bit good work still in there that would be
> useful to have in 1.3
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 03:14:50 +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> Hi Pauli
>
> 2009/3/22 Pauli Virtanen :
>> Previously, I did the cherry-picking just by reading through the full
>> patch, but now I added a feature to the doc wiki that allows to
>> parallelize this:
>>
>> 1. Go to http://docs.scip
Hi Pauli
2009/3/22 Pauli Virtanen :
> Previously, I did the cherry-picking just by reading through the full
> patch, but now I added a feature to the doc wiki that allows to
> parallelize this:
>
> 1. Go to http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/patch/
> 2. Click on a link in the patch list. This shows
Hi all, (esp. David)
Is there still time for a merge from the doc wiki for 1.3.x?
Stefan already merged several reviewed docstrings a while ago. My current
worry is that there's quite a bit good work still in there that would be
useful to have in 1.3.0, but which, despite being an improvement o
10 matches
Mail list logo