I see your time machine is in full working order :-)
--
Travis Oliphant
(on a mobile)
512-826-7480
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Hey Mark,
>
> I spent some quality time with your iterator docs tonight and look forwar
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Hey Mark,
>
> I spent some quality time with your iterator docs tonight and look forward
> to getting into the code a bit more soon. I wanted to get your general
> impressions about what it would take to extend the iterator API to handle
I believe I sent the wrong link to PDL, threading, earlier
http://www.johnlapeyre.com/pdl/pdldoc/newbook/node5.html#SECTION00510
Is the explanation of threading in Perl that I was reading about. I have read
about Threading earlier and really liked it's generality. I would
Hey Mark,
I spent some quality time with your iterator docs tonight and look forward to
getting into the code a bit more soon. I wanted to get your general
impressions about what it would take to extend the iterator API to handle
iterating over "regions" of the inputs --- i.e. to support gen
Thanks! What a great doc page.
-Travis
On Feb 1, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> The macro PyArray_RemoveLarges
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The macro PyArray_RemoveLargest has been replaced by
>> PyArray_RemoveSmallest (which seems stra
On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> The macro PyArray_RemoveLargest has been replaced by PyArray_RemoveSmallest
> (which seems strange), but I wonder if this documentation still makes sense.
>
> My impression about this c
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> The macro PyArray_RemoveLargest has been replaced by
> PyArray_RemoveSmallest (which seems strange), but I wonder if this
> documentation still makes sense.
>
My impression about this code is that it went through a number of rounds
trying
The macro PyArray_RemoveLargest has been replaced by PyArray_RemoveSmallest
(which seems strange), but I wonder if this documentation still makes sense.
diff --git a/doc/source/user/c-info.beyond-basics.rst b/doc/source/user/
c-info.beyond-basics.rs
index 9ed2ab3..3437985 100644
--- a/doc/source/u
