Re: [Numpy-discussion] Downstream integration testing

2016-01-31 Thread Pauli Virtanen
31.01.2016, 14:41, Daπid kirjoitti: > On 31 Jan 2016 13:08, "Pauli Virtanen" wrote: >> For example, automated test rig that does the following: >> >> - run tests of a given downstream project version, against >> previous numpy version, record output >> >> - run tests of a given downstream projec

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Downstream integration testing

2016-01-31 Thread Daπid
On 31 Jan 2016 13:08, "Pauli Virtanen" wrote: > For example, automated test rig that does the following: > > - run tests of a given downstream project version, against > previous numpy version, record output > > - run tests of a given downstream project version, against > numpy master, record

[Numpy-discussion] Downstream integration testing

2016-01-31 Thread Pauli Virtanen
31.01.2016, 12:57, Julian Taylor kirjoitti: [clip] > Testing or delegating testing of least our major downstreams should be > the job of the release manager. > Thus I also disagree with our more frequent releases. It puts too much > porting and testing effort on our downstreams and it gets infeaseb