Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
On 16.05.2014 10:59, Dave Hirschfeld wrote:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
Yes, I'd heard about the improvements and am very excited to try them out
since indexing is one of the bottlenecks in our
On Do, 2014-05-15 at 12:31 +, Dave Hirschfeld wrote:
As can be seen from the code below (or in the notebook linked beneath) fancy
indexing of a structured array is twice as slow as indexing both fields
independently - making it 4x slower?
I found that fancy indexing was a bottleneck in
On Do, 2014-05-15 at 12:31 +, Dave Hirschfeld wrote:
As can be seen from the code below (or in the notebook linked beneath) fancy
indexing of a structured array is twice as slow as indexing both fields
independently - making it 4x slower?
I found that fancy indexing was a bottleneck in
Sebastian Berg sebastian at sipsolutions.net writes:
On Do, 2014-05-15 at 12:31 +, Dave Hirschfeld wrote:
As can be seen from the code below (or in the notebook linked beneath)
fancy
indexing of a structured array is twice as slow as indexing both fields
independently - making it
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Do, 2014-05-15 at 12:31 +, Dave Hirschfeld wrote:
As can be seen from the code below (or in the notebook linked beneath) fancy
indexing of a structured array is twice as slow as indexing both fields
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
if ~50% faster is fast enough a simple improvement would be to replace
the use of PyArg_ParseTuple with manual tuple unpacking.
The PyArg functions are incredibly slow and is not required in
VOID_copyswap which just extracts 'Oi.
On 16.05.2014 10:59, Dave Hirschfeld wrote:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
if ~50% faster is fast enough a simple improvement would be to replace
the use of PyArg_ParseTuple with manual tuple unpacking.
The PyArg functions are incredibly slow and is not required in
As can be seen from the code below (or in the notebook linked beneath) fancy
indexing of a structured array is twice as slow as indexing both fields
independently - making it 4x slower?
I found that fancy indexing was a bottleneck in my application so I was
hoping to reduce the overhead by