Re: [Numpy-discussion] Matrix multiplication infix operator PEP nearly ready to go

2014-03-12 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote: > On 3/12/2014 6:04 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4351 > > The Semantics section still begins with 0d, then 2d, then 1d, then nd. > Given the context of the proposal, the order should be: > > 2d (the core n

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Matrix multiplication infix operator PEP nearly ready to go

2014-03-12 Thread Alan G Isaac
On 3/12/2014 6:04 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4351 The Semantics section still begins with 0d, then 2d, then 1d, then nd. Given the context of the proposal, the order should be: 2d (the core need expressed in the proposal) nd (which generalizes via broadca

[Numpy-discussion] Matrix multiplication infix operator PEP nearly ready to go

2014-03-12 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Hi all, The proposal to add an infix operator to Python for matrix multiplication is nearly ready for its debut on python-ideas; so if you want to look it over first, just want to check out where it's gone, then now's a good time: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4351 The basic idea here is