Quick update:
- the current static content for docs.scipy.org is about 2.7Gb. Some clean
can happen but probably not going below 1Gb.
- www.scipy.org is really small.
-- Didrik
On 16 March 2017 at 23:18, Robert T. McGibbon wrote:
> I have always put my docs on Amazon S3 (examples: http://md
I have always put my docs on Amazon S3 (examples: http://mdtraj.org/1.8.0/
, .http://msmbuilder.org/3.7.0/) For static webpages, you can't beat the
cost, and there's a lot of tooling in the wild for uploading pages to S3.
It might be an option to consider.
-Robert
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:08 PM
Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:15:08 +0100, Didrik Pinte kirjoitti:
>> The advantage of something like github pages is that it's big enough
>> that it *does* have dedicated ops support.
>
> Agreed. One issue is that we are working with a lot of legacy. Github
> will more than likely be a great solution to hos
On 15 March 2017 at 22:56, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Bryan Van de ven
> wrote:
> > NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally sponsored project, perhaps they can help
> with the costs of different/better hosting.
>
> Enthought already provides hosting and operations support (th
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:56:52 -0700, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> As long as we can fit under the 1 gig size limit then GH pages seems
>> like the best option so far... it's reliable, widely understood, and all
>> of the limits be
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:56:52 -0700, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
[clip]
> As long as we can fit under the 1 gig size limit then GH pages seems
> like the best option so far... it's reliable, widely understood, and all
> of the limits besides the 1 gig size are soft limits where they say
> they'll work w
On Mar 15, 2017 05:47, "Ralf Gommers" wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36
> hours:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439
>
> This has happened before:
>
> https:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Bryan Van de ven wrote:
> NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally sponsored project, perhaps they can help with
> the costs of different/better hosting.
Enthought already provides hosting and operations support (thanks!) –
the problem is that it doesn't make sense to have a
On Mar 15, 2017 12:28 PM, "Pauli Virtanen" wrote:
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:11:09 -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk kirjoitti:
> Astropy uses readthedocs quite happily (auto-updates on merges to master
> too).
AFAIK, scipy cannot be built on readthedocs.
Another issue is that switching to rtd would (I thin
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:11:09 -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk kirjoitti:
> Astropy uses readthedocs quite happily (auto-updates on merges to master
> too).
AFAIK, scipy cannot be built on readthedocs.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
Astropy uses readthedocs quite happily (auto-updates on merges to master too).
-- Marten
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
What about readthedocs? I haven't seen any explicit limit in traffic.
On 15 March 2017 at 16:33, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The scipy.org site is down a
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36
>> hours:
>>
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439
>>
>> This has
How is it that scipy.org's bandwidth usage is that much greater than
matplotlib.org's? We are quite image-heavy, but we haven't hit any
bandwidth limits that I am aware of.
Ben Root
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Bryan Van de ven
wrote:
> NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally sponsored project, perhap
NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally sponsored project, perhaps they can help with the
costs of different/better hosting.
Bryan
> On Mar 15, 2017, at 07:24, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2017 02:47, "Ralf Gommers" wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
> Hi
Doesn't help all the CI builds that are failing because they utilize
intersphinx to link to the official docs, unfortunately.
Bryan
> On Mar 15, 2017, at 05:59, Ilhan Polat wrote:
>
> By the way, this is not bad at all in the absence of the actual documentation
> http://devdocs.io/numpy~1.1
On Mar 15, 2017 02:47, "Ralf Gommers" wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36
> hours:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439
>
> This has happened before:
>
> https:
By the way, this is not bad at all in the absence of the actual
documentation http://devdocs.io/numpy~1.12/
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
> In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so
> that people can see that this is an open issue? As we clos
In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so
that people can see that this is an open issue? As we close them they
disappear from the issues tab on Github
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
> wro
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36
> hours:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439
>
> This has happened before:
>
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/issues/187#issue-186
Hi,
The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 hours:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439
This has happened before:
https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/issues/187#issue-186426408
I think it was down for about 24 hours that time.
>From the num
21 matches
Mail list logo