On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 23:42, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am strongly against dropping 2.4 support anytime soon. I haven't seen
a strong rationale for using = 2.5 features in numpy, supporting 2.4 is
not so hard, and 2.4 is still the default python version on many OS (mac
os X
While my feelings aren't as strong as David's, they are pretty much identical.
As a point of reference, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 won't come out
until at least the first quarter of 2010. Until then we should make a
serious effort to support Python 2.4, which ships with RHEL 5. It
looks
Matthieu Brucher wrote:
At least several months, if not years. RedHat supports each version 7
years, for instance (I don't ask for that long).
Currently, I'm still using a RHEL 4, although it is planned to migrate
to RHEL 5 next year. So we should still support 2.4 for at least 18
months, in
All,
* What versions of Python should be supported by what version of
numpy ? Are we to expect users to rely on Python2.5 for the upcoming
1.3.x ? Could we have some kind of timeline on the trac site or
elsewhere (and if such a timeline exists already, can I get the link?) ?
* Talking
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Pierre GM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* What versions of Python should be supported by what version of
numpy ? Are we to expect users to rely on Python2.5 for the upcoming
1.3.x ? Could we have some kind of timeline on the trac site or
elsewhere (and if such a
On Dec 7, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote:
NumPy 1.3.x should work with Python 2.4, 2.5, and 2.6. At some point
we can drop 2.4, but I would like to wait a bit since we just dropped
2.3 support. The timeline is on the trac site:
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/milestone/1.3.0
Jarrod Millman wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Pierre GM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* What versions of Python should be supported by what version of
numpy ? Are we to expect users to rely on Python2.5 for the upcoming
1.3.x ? Could we have some kind of timeline on the trac site or
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:42 PM, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am strongly against dropping 2.4 support anytime soon. I haven't seen
a strong rationale for using = 2.5 features in numpy, supporting 2.4 is
not so hard, and 2.4 is still the default python version on many OS (mac
os
