Zachary Pincus wrote:
building python extensions as Mac-PPC and Mac-Intel fat
binaries, so I'm turning to the wisdom of this list for a few questions.
I'd try the pythonmac list too -- there are folks there that actually
understand all this!
My general goal is to make a double-clickable
Christopher Barker wrote:
I'm no expert, but the glory of distutils is that it will, by default
build extensions the same way as python itself was built. So if you use
a PPC python, you'll get PPC extensions, same with Intel, and if you use
a Universal Python, you'll get a Universal
Robert Kern wrote:
even though
Universal binaries built on 10.4 systems would usually work on 10.3.9, numpy
doesn't.
Darn, but I for one, can live without 10.3.9 support -- it does build
Universal properly for 10.4 doesn't it?
The R folks have a package containing gcc 4.0.3 with gfortran
Christopher Barker wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
even though
Universal binaries built on 10.4 systems would usually work on 10.3.9, numpy
doesn't.
Darn, but I for one, can live without 10.3.9 support -- it does build
Universal properly for 10.4 doesn't it?
I've never tested it.
--
Robert
Hi folks,
I've been doing a lot of web-reading on the subject, but have not
been completely able to synthesize all of the disparate bits of
advice about building python extensions as Mac-PPC and Mac-Intel fat
binaries, so I'm turning to the wisdom of this list for a few questions.
My
