Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release management (was: Updated differences between 1.5.1 to 1.6.1)

2012-02-15 Thread Travis Oliphant
On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:32 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > Hi Travis, > > > > It is great that some resource

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release management (was: Updated differences between 1.5.1 to 1.6.1)

2012-02-15 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > >> >> On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:32 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: >> >> > Hi Travis, >> > >> > It is great that some resources can be spent to have people paid to >> > work on NumPy. Thank

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release management (was: Updated differences between 1.5.1 to 1.6.1)

2012-02-15 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:14:11PM -0600, Bruce Southey wrote: > Ralf, > I will miss you as a numpy release manager! > You have not only done an incredible job but also taken the role to a > higher level. > Your attitude and attention to details has been amazing. I definitely +1 that. I think that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release management (was: Updated differences between 1.5.1 to 1.6.1)

2012-02-14 Thread David Warde-Farley
On 2012-02-14, at 10:14 PM, Bruce Southey wrote: > I will miss you as a numpy release manager! > You have not only done an incredible job but also taken the role to a > higher level. > Your attitude and attention to details has been amazing. +1, hear hear! Thank you for all the time you've inves

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release management (was: Updated differences between 1.5.1 to 1.6.1)

2012-02-14 Thread Bruce Southey
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:32 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: >> >> > Hi Travis, >> > >> > It is great that some resources can be spent to have people paid to >> > work on NumPy. T

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release management (was: Updated differences between 1.5.1 to 1.6.1)

2012-02-14 Thread Travis Oliphant
> > Travis, it's very good to see that the release manager role can be filled > going forward (it's not the most popular job), but I think the way it should > work is that people volunteer for this role and then the community agrees on > giving a volunteer that role. > > I actually started co

[Numpy-discussion] Release management (was: Updated differences between 1.5.1 to 1.6.1)

2012-02-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:32 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > Hi Travis, > > > > It is great that some resources can be spent to have people paid to > > work on NumPy. Thank you for making that happen. > > > > I am slightly confused about ro