Re: [Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-22 Thread Chris Kees
On 8/22/08 11:34 AM, "Michael Abshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Kern wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 07:00, Chris Kees >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > >>> I've been experimenting with both a non-framework, non-universal 64-bit >>> build and a 4-way universal build of the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-22 Thread Michael Abshoff
Robert Kern wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 07:00, Chris Kees > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, >> I've been experimenting with both a non-framework, non-universal 64-bit >> build and a 4-way universal build of the python (2.6) trunk with numpy >> 1.1.1. The non-framework 64 build appears to give

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-22 Thread Robert Kern
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 07:00, Chris Kees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been experimenting with both a non-framework, non-universal 64-bit > build and a 4-way universal build of the python (2.6) trunk with numpy > 1.1.1. The non-framework 64 build appears to give me exactly the same > results f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-22 Thread Chris Kees
I've been experimenting with both a non-framework, non-universal 64-bit build and a 4-way universal build of the python (2.6) trunk with numpy 1.1.1. The non-framework 64 build appears to give me exactly the same results from numpy.test() as the standard 32-bit version (as well as allowing large ar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-21 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
2008/8/21 Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I currently have "Solaris 10 SPARC" reserved for you. Would you like > another one for MacOSX 64? I have re-activated the configuration for Solaris 10 SPARC. Regards Stéfan ___ Numpy-discussion maili

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-21 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
2008/8/21 Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Stéfan van der Walt wrote: >> 2008/8/21 Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> William Stein is at Scipy 08 and there seems to be at least some >>> interest in 64 bit OSX binaries. If anyone wants one let me know and I >>> can put one together once

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-21 Thread Michael Abshoff
Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > 2008/8/21 Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> William Stein is at Scipy 08 and there seems to be at least some >> interest in 64 bit OSX binaries. If anyone wants one let me know and I >> can put one together once Scipy 0.7 and Numpy 1.1.2 are out. > > There is sti

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-21 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
2008/8/21 Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > William Stein is at Scipy 08 and there seems to be at least some > interest in 64 bit OSX binaries. If anyone wants one let me know and I > can put one together once Scipy 0.7 and Numpy 1.1.2 are out. There is still interest in having a 64-bit OSX b

[Numpy-discussion] Revisiting numpy/scipy on 64 bit OSX

2008-08-21 Thread Michael Abshoff
Hi, I have been playing with 64 bit numpy/scipy on OSX 10.5 Intel again. I thought everything worked after the last time we discussed this, but I noticed that I had Scipy import failures in for example optimize since the gfortran I used creates 32 bit code per default. So I build a gcc 4.2.4 o